OER beyond Lumen

As my time as guest editor in this space draws to a close, I’d wanted to write about an event, and particularly the events going on around the open educational resource initiative happening at CUNY. In fact, I attended such an event early this month with that very intention. However, this event, like many others, was run by Lumen Learning and served as an introduction, or less charitably, an advertisement, for one of their products. In fact, this has been broadly true of many of the training events around this initiative, and I find it a little troubling that CUNY is leaning on Lumen so heavily.

There are, of course, good reasons for this.  The OER initiative has run largely on short deadlines, and it is challenging to get an OER program up and running. Turning to a vendor is an expedient way to begin initiatives quickly.

However, we should be cautious about allowing our conversations to be moderated by vendors, particularly conversations about openness and service to our communities. Thus, I will avoid summarizing that webinar here and will instead use this space to point to some interesting conversations and tools around OER issues that I’ve come across recently.

OER Authoring Tools List

This list of OER Authoring Tools by Michele DeSilva (Central Oregon Community College) and Amy Hofer (Open Oregon Educational Resources) usefully compares several OER platforms. I like this list because it helps to make transparent the differences among these tools. It points out which tools are proprietary, which ones cost money to use, and which ones have formatting or licensing issues to keep in mind.

The list itself is also open to edit.

Thanks to Greg Gosselin for sharing this tool on the CUNY OER listserv.

Open Educational Resources and Digital Humanities

I attended another webinar, this time on engaging with digital humanities projects (“Reading and Engaging with Existing Digital Humanities Projects”). The presenter, Paige Morgan, discusses the role that projects like the Lost Friends Exhibition can play in providing new entry points into a field of study. Although Morgan does not specifically address openness in her talk, except to note that in some cases these projects are making materials available online for the first time, it strikes me that it may be useful to seek OER, not in OER platforms, but in disciplinary collections like NINES or 18thConnect. Is the William Blake Archive an OER? It does not advertise itself that way, but it could certainly be used as a teaching tool.

My intention is not to argue that all digital scholarship projects are OER in disguise.  Rather, I hope to suggest that the category of “things that could be useful as OER” is a more helpful one than “things that are explicitly labeled OER,” particularly as the latter tends to lead us back to digital textbooks and companies like Lumen.

Tying it all together

The two approaches I’ve mentioned in this post are very different from each other, and I am convinced there are many more ways to think about this.  Ultimately, I’m an OER neophyte and still wrapping my head around it.  My hope with this post, then, was mainly to remind myself (and maybe others) to think more broadly where open educational resources are concerned.

Editor’s Choice “Natural Allies”: Librarians, Archivists, and Big Data in International Digital Humanities Project Work ← dh+lib

Editor’s Choice: RESOURCE: “Natural Allies”: Librarians, Archivists, and Big Data in International Digital Humanities Project Work ← dh+lib

Digital Humanities projects are proliferating in academia and cultural institutions. Librarians will find the article highlighted below valuable in its discussion of roles for librarians and archivists in digital humanities projects.

This post that appeared originally in dh+lib Review  (Note: Roxanne Shirazi, of CUNY, is an editor):

Alex H. Poole and Deborah Garwood (both Drexel University) have submitted a pre-print of their article, “‘Natural Allies’: Librarians, Archivists, and Big Data in International Digital Humanities Project Work,” to ResearchGate.

From the paper introduction:

This paper first reviews the literature, concentrating on the relationships among digital humanities (DH), Library and Information and Science (LIS), and libraries and librarians.
Second, it explains and justifies the study’s qualitative approach. Third, it reports the findings of the study and discusses their ramifications, focusing on librarians’ and archivists’ official and unofficial involvement in projects and on their specific roles and responsibilities. Additionally, it probes three issues that speak directly to bolstering librarians’ and archivists’ participation in projects such as DID3: digital curation, LIS education and professional preparation, and outreach opportunities for librarians and archivists. Fifth, conclusions and six recommendations for future research are advanced.

The paper is scheduled to appear in a forthcoming issue of The Journal of Documentation. The pre-print can be downloaded without logging into ResearchGate.

dh+lib Review

This post was produced through a cooperation between Tierney Gleason, Arianne Hartsell-Gundy, Megan Martinsen, and Leah Richardson (Editors-at-large for the week), Caitlin Christian-Lamb (Editor for the week), and Nickoal Eichmann-Kalwara, Sarah Melton, Roxanne Shirazi, and Patrick Williams (dh+lib Review Editors).